Understanding the implications of using a zencontrol AC3 over 3 zencontrol AC1 pro controllers

Benefits such as:

1) 6 DIN rail space required for 3 controllers inside the AC3, compared to 12 required if using AC1 controllers

2) The included network switch allows for daisy chaining multiple controllers together, reducing networking infrastructure costs

3) Reduced supply wiring for powering controllers

With buildings becoming more connected than before, some additional questions need to be addressed before considering if the use of AC3 controllers are suitable.

1) Will the stakeholder in charge of deploying and maintaining the ICN allow for an unmanaged network switch to be connected to their network?

This is important as the AC3 includes a built in unmanaged network switch, which may be considered a cybersecurity risk.

2) Will this same stakeholder also allow for 3 or more physical devices to be connected to a single network port on the ICN?

For the purpose of cybersecurity, a network port on the ICN may be limited to a single MAC address. An AC3 controller has 3 MAC addresses (one for each application controller). When daisy chaining AC3 controllers together, the MAC address quantity then begins to grow.

Failing these questions will lead to a design that must be implemented with AC1 controllers.

If you suspect that the project will likely have security concerns around the implementation of a zencontrol installation on any aspect related to connecting an application controller to an ICN and its related cloud functionality, please reach out to support@lumenresources.com.au with your questions or concerns.